The Vast Horizon

Atu XVII “The Star” has a certain ‘technical’ aspect to it*, but it may be better called “The Stars” for average functionality. After the utterly shattering experience of Atu XVI “The Blasted Tower”, when all you thought was ‘certain’ is absolutely laid to waste, what is there left? The previous ‘prison walls’ have been completely destroyed, and now, “liberated”, what is there? A Vast Emptiness, but, wait, “it’s full of stars!” Amidst the overwhelming Sense of Emptiness, there appears to be “hopes” of “discreteness”. They may be mere “dots”, but they cascade a sense of “center-ness”; an odd sense of ‘unity’ for each of them amidst the “non-unity” of the vast emptiness.

Here is where all the metaphors of “hope” and “anticipation” arise. This is why this page (card) is associated with the Astrological House 11 (and then by further association the Zodiacal Sign Aquarius). After The Prison Walls have been utterly destroyed, the mind desperately seeks to re-assemble any sense of ‘certainty’. In that Vast Emptiness, the “sense of stars” is a first step to re-assembling that desperate ‘sense of certainty’.

For physical beings, who have grown up knowing only physical-gravitational being-ness, when that sense of ‘physical-gravitational being-ness’ is utterly violated on the most immediate parameter (Atu XVI), and plunged into An Emptiness, a lack of the previous, it is not surprising that the first attempt to re-assembly would be to seek out any similarity. In the “open emptiness” of “space”, the stars offer the first best evidence of the previous state.

(By the way, Atu IX “The Hermit” only really makes sense when you get that the Trump Series was crafted by those who had gone way past that stage, and had actually achieved this “Star” stage.)

The metaphors of “hope” and “ambition” are rather superficial with regard to this emblem. But in relation to using this page (card) in a reading, even though I would dissuade from “hope” and “ambition” metaphors, I may ask the querent: “If everything were to go-to-shit, and nobody gave a damn about you, What Might You Want?”

O-A-Hum
OPD

*There is the legend that “this star” is that of Sirius. Aside from all the other legends, there is one that is rather outstanding. The legend speaks that this was a “dying” system, and that in order to preserve that system, a kind of “projection” was induced. We “of the Earth” are the result of that projection. This metaphor calls into question all such as the “Matrix” metaphor. Thus the metaphors of “hope” take on a whole new flavor. Some ‘god-awful’ sense that “we” are the result of some desperate attempt to salvage a “dying class”. Now the whole ‘Holy Guardian Angel’ metaphor assumes a completely different flavor. I do not assume to ‘be correct’ about this; I simply wonder.
I have not been secret about my attitude about “deity”; which includes the sanctified ‘Holy Guardian Angel’ metaphor. There is a class of ‘entity’ which desperately requires that we “believe” in “its” existence, in order to exist. Even in “physical biology” we acquiesce to the existence of “parasites” that rely on a “host body” to accept its existence as part of its own functioning — without the host body “knowing”.
That is why I am glad I never took up Ceremonial Magick. (For those who did, just look into “Zen” as described by Alan Watts. He provides the clues to ‘separate’ from the “toxin” of Ceremonial Magick, and make it ‘fuller’ there-from.)

Be Here Now

After the shattering experience of Atu XVIII, the complete destruction of any ‘sense of certainty’, the rising dawn of light is an overwhelming relief! Atu XIX is rather a re-invigoration after the utter bleakness. Anyone who has been up all night out in the wild, feeling the cold increase as the night continues, until it is literally coldest just before dawn, knows the absolutely cheerful welcome of the morning Sun. Likewise, when the house is plunged into darkness, the handy flashlight is very much a best friend, and you feel a soothing sense of sanity after the frightful interruption. Thus you have the metaphors of “illumination” and “clarity”.

When I use the metaphor of the “Fuel Source” or “Fuel Cell” for Atu XIX, in relation to the Space-Time Vehicle that should be depicted with Atu XX, I am not just spouting a cute novelty. The ‘certainty’ derived from “clear perception” definitely drives our very living. After the Utter Darkness* of Atu XVIII which ‘complicates’ one’s otherwise ordinary condition, the “light of day” returns one to simplicity. What was ‘insanity’ has resumed ‘sanity’ — and it is not unwarranted to compare that to ‘sanitation’: the “light of day” has literally ‘cleansed’ the scene of all the “monsters”.

To me, the Core Idea of Atu XIX is not the “illumination” and “clarity”, but rather the Simplicity. After surviving a dangerous situation, the first sensation is to be glad to be simply alive. Atu XIX is like the attitude of “whew, I dodged that one!”; and for that first brief moment, all other considerations are like so much appended weight. You get a good glimpse at Just Being, even if it is only for a moment.

Remember that Atu XIX is toward ‘the end’ of the Trump Series, after a lot of ‘work-on-self’ has been performed, and many stages of transformation have transpired. With all of the complexities that have been experienced, Atu XIX represents a kind of ‘resting point’ (so to speak). The best manifestation of this ‘resting point’ is the overwhelming sensation of Be Here Now, in its full Simplicity. For those who have done the full working of the Trump Series, the resultant Be Here Now of Atu XIX can be said to ‘extend’ well beyond “the moment” — even though, paradoxically, “the moment” becomes ‘extended’.

O-A-Hum
OPD

*”Darkness” can be a rather misleading metaphor, when considered only as “absence of light”. When considered as “a blotting out”, it is completely appropriate. “Black” is called “an absence of color”, but it really isn’t — it is ‘a color’ as compared to the “nullification” that I remember. “Neutral grey” is also still ‘a color’ in comparison. Genuine “absence of color” cannot be described, only directly experienced.
“Utter Darkness” is my convenient metaphor for “complete annihilation of sanity”.

“What Was That?!”

Atu XVIII is referred to “The Moon”, but its most initial Core Idea is that of “The Night”. The extreme example is the Moonless Night, and this serves as the best launching pad for all that follows. For entities that are rather dependent on light for visual sensation, absolute darkness is a very good first stage of Utter Doubt. A primal sense of coordination is deprived, and other senses not light-dependent must engage to a greater degree than ‘normal’. These adjustments are necessary to help maintain ‘a sense of certainty’ that is generally sensory-oriented. When “the Moonless Night” metaphor is taken to an extreme itself, a.k.a. Utter Darkness, that would also include lack of sound, taste, touch, etc., and becomes what is known as a “sensory-deprivation chamber”. Now all the usual instruments of ‘a sense of certainty’ have been made abrogate.

When all of “the usual devices engendering a sense of certainty” are comprehensively turned off, there is no immediate engaging of “another device” to “re-establish certainty”. What does immediately occur is The Overwhelming Sense of Fear! It is only when that Overwhelming Sense of Fear extends beyond the awful initial phase that then the Overwhelming Sense of Doubt joins into the subjective drama. Then the twin siblings of Overwhelming Fear & Doubt have the stage-play for rather a considerably long time during this absolute denial of “certainty”. It is only well into the ‘drama of uncertainty’ that other “make-sense” faculties kick into gear. These are faculties that the fraternity/sorority calls “occult senses”. Unfortunately, with honest investigation, these “new senses” are really no more “real” than the previous “relied-upon” senses that described ‘certainty’. But, when you are shit-out-of-luck, you take whatever you can get! And you are ‘no less’ for taking that. But, hopefully, the ‘sense’ of “perception is a gamble” is firmly becoming ‘real’.

Now, what about a Moon-Lit Night? The absolute “sensory-deprivation chamber” metaphor doesn’t apply, but is the perceiver any better off? Now, instead of the absolute abrogation of the previous sensory-reinforcing ‘certainty’, another odd factor kicks in. Now, the “Moon-Lit Night” provides somewhat satisfactions of that otherwise Light-Dependent Satisfaction of “Sensory Certainty”. Unlike ‘daytime’ when The Tree is definitely A Tree, now The Tree is some indefinite construct. Hues are shifted and shadows increase, and , frankly, “wobbles” are ‘more apparent’. Whereas with the “Moonless Night” there is definitely No Tree, with the MoonLit Night there is Maybe A Tree. The whole perceptual experience takes on a whole other level of annoyance. At least with Complete Darkness, ‘certainty’ is utterly abrogate; with “somewhat darkness”, ‘certainty’ is played for even the further fool. A fleeting sound within the “MoonLit Night” can engender imagination to morph the ‘visual glimpse’ into ‘a virtual vampire’. The Sense of Fear & Doubt has full Power to Morph the Fleeting Glimpse into An Utter Monster.

“Indefinite Construct” is very much the Core Idea of Atu XVIII. (That is why the association with Astrological Pisces.)

O-A-Hum
OPD

Enemy of The State

The core idea of Atu VX “The Devil” is that of Enjoying Any Sensory Experience that you desire. By extension, that includes Any Sensual Experience that you desire. All other considerations are auxiliary. But, to me, the primary auxiliary consideration is rather the Abandonment of Morality: to actually ‘know’ that “morality” is an artificial construct. Here there is no such thing as a “wrong” activity. Even ‘murder’ is not a “wrong” act — just merely inconvenient for the recipient.

The greatest virtue of Atus XV and XVI is that of “Change Your Mind and Attitude”, or rather “Open Your Mind and Attitude”. Ignoring this prime directive at these stages does result in “failure”. (Thus Atu XV also tends to be interpreted in terms of “incoming occult knowledge” or other similar metaphors.)

In the Crowley-Harris version of this image is blatantly displayed a grand phallus plunging its ‘head’ into “a hole”. All that Crowley says of this “hole” is that it is “the rings of Nuit”. He does not further specify “what hole” it is. It is frankly any “hole” that the phallus (or, the phallus-wielder) desires: a vagina, a mouth, an anus, even a hole in a tree — so be it. The best in “The Devil” is “how can I take the most advantage in all that is available”.

For those obsessed with “correct” or “incorrect” behavior, this portrait is of Wanton Abandon to Pleasure. Some people choose to freely and openly exhibit “their devil” without embarrassment. Others are embarrassed by “their devil” and ‘reveal’ it only within secluded confines, but still plague their mind with the “wrongness” of the act. The other set of secret practitioners fear the reactions of otherwise surrounding moralists, but themselves do not consider it “wrong”. There is a so-called ‘fourth class’ who wantonly display “their devil” with the added sensory delight of offending the surrounding moralists who think the act is “wrong”.

It is too bad that much of the discussions surrounding this idea tend to obsess around “sexual” considerations, given the rampant “sex-embarrassment” entrenched in not just any one human culture. I re-emphasize that this matter is about Sensory Experience, not just Sensual Experience. If someone enjoys being physically hurt, it does not automatically translate into a “sexual” experience. Yes, it is sensual, i.e. sensory. If someone enjoys watching someone else ‘puking their brains out’, finds it funny, there is nothing “wrong” with that — and there is nothing inherently “sexual” about the enjoyment either (but if it is, so be it).

Atu XV happens to focus on Abandonment of the artificial construct called “Morality”. (Abandonment of all other remaining artificial constructs rather occurs with Atu XVI — thus it is a much more devastating portrayal.) If one honestly examines the nature of “morality”, with its simplistic notions of “right” and “wrong” behavior, it is not difficult to see its intimate tie to sensory experience on all levels. It is by the ‘abandonment’ of this artificial construct that one gains a perspective on the nature of “moral” construction; then, at least, you become ‘the master’ of Your Moral Behavior, rather than being a slave to some “external absolute”. Herein lies my most profound objection to any “sane” discussion of “Evil” and ‘his’ companions with regard to this page (card). “Evil” has become one of those imagined absolutes that plagues the thought processes of those who want “external absolutes”. “Good” and “Evil”, “Right” and “Wrong” (which are merely emotional tags) have been turned, by many who desperately desire a sense of order, into comparative ‘deities’: absolutes unquestionable; violations of which are met with consternation. The reader who succumbs to any rant about “inappropriate behavior” when this page (card) appears in a reading, reveals themself as still enraptured with that spectre of “righteousness”. (And then there is no wonder, in this mind, why Atu XVI appears even more “mis-translated”.)

Atus XV and XVI are not the initiation of Breaking Limitations: that initiation occurred earlier in the Trump Series. These pages (cards) happen to focus on the Breaking of Sacredly-Held Limitations.

When this page (card) appears in a reading spread, along with whatever it may indicate for the querent (client) amidst the context of the spread, it should also serve as a reminder to the reader to carefully observe any “moral limitations” sacredly held by the reader, and to make an extra effort to not allow such to bias the reading. If I am doing a reading for a housing banker, and see indications that the client is about to foreclose on a bunch of delinquent mortgages, I have to resist the temptation to sabotage the reading that might help sabotage such an impending act — despite my “moral” objection to that act.

O-A-Hum
OPD

The Initial Vehicle

I consider Atu VII to be the first “real lesson” in the Trump Series. Atus I-VI have been of the nature of preparation. (It can be argued that Atu VI, due to the complex nature of its depiction, is the first lesson. I would simply argue that it is the last, and most important, lesson in the preparation*.)

The metaphor of “The Chariot” has been a favorite amongst many traditions as a standard for describing the status of “an ordinary being”. Even Gurdjieff, who did not subscribe to the standard “occult” retinue, unhesitatingly used the “chariot” metaphor to describe “the beginning status” to his students. The metaphor is utterly simple. There is the Main Vehicle. Added to that is the Conductor and the Moving Force. The ‘reigns’ connecting the ‘conductor’ to the ‘moving force’ is the first auxiliary metaphor-extension.

(For those who play with the Crowley-Harris version of this image, there are no ‘reigns’ connecting ‘the driver’ to ‘the driving force’. But the ‘reigns’ are apparent if you view the surrounding rings radiant from the ‘held cup’, which is like “a steering wheel”. This “steering wheel” is very much equivalent to “a scrying medium” (cup-of-water, crystal-ball, etc.).)

This icon is very much The Somatic Vehicle. It is What We Begin With!

With Atus I-VI, the initiate has been ‘prepared’ with a diet of concepts that build from “relative nothing-ness” to “relative something-ness”.

Atu VII is that “slam” of “this is actually what you have to deal with, in the beginning”. You have this Bio-Form! It has some basic intrinsic properties. It is “the first consideration” in all of your consideration(s) of “How Am I Going to Navigate ‘This’ Universe?” It is rather ‘the question from very birth’. From the very beginning of stumblings, that ‘question’ is all-pervasive. This is ‘the lesson’ of this Trump: “how do I deal with this stumbling temple?”

The “lesson” takes on properties of cognizing a kind of “visceral” cognizance. “The Body” has a kind of ‘wisdom’ of its own. We use the metaphor of “feeling my way” through “all of this”. The basic english language has the one handicap of using the term “feel” in both a bio-sensory and an emotional way. It doesn’t help that this dual definition is equally valid. (Thus the association of this Trump with the Astrological Cancer.) That is why I have chosen to use the metaphor of “Visceral Navigation” with this Trump.

But Atu VII is much more than mere “visceral navigation”. It rather epitomizes the Entire Body Sense. To actually “feel” that ‘this body’ is ‘a vehicle’. To cognize that you are “navigating a vehicle” is of supreme importance!

O-A-Hum
OPD

* Atu VI has the awesome responsibility of transmitting the most primal lesson of “The Metaphor of The Student”, who must principally cognize Two Key Ingredients in One’s Composition, which the “Gnostics” labeled ‘The Eidolon’ and ‘The Daemon’. They are “the intimate lovers” co-existing in “one house”. The average description to this image is that “a marriage is occurring” — but “the awful secret” is that “there really was never a separation”, and that “the marriage” is kind of “after-the-fact”. The metaphor of “a marriage” is based on a delusion that there was ‘a separate status’ that ‘had to be married’. The “marriage ritual” is as a formality, in the sense that “the separate two” were never really “separate” — it only appeared as such. The “marriage” has “been arranged” from the very beginning.

The Student

Atu VI is commonly called “The Lovers”. The ‘Golden Dawn’ version of this image is a fascinating break from the now-classic Waite-Smith version, where a hero rushes in to rescue a maiden in distress. There have been other versions that emphasize what was only hinted within the Crowley-Harris version: “Eve” and “Lilith” flanking the central figure. “Lilith” was ‘the first wife’, but was ‘made’ unruly. ‘She’ was then divorced, and then “Eve” was brought about to be ‘obedient’. (The legend of “Eve” eating the fruit, aside from the vast other interpretations, was a confusion of ‘her’ with the ‘disobedient’ “Lilith”.) “Eve” tends to be depicted as “soft and beautiful”, while “Lilith” tends to be depicted as “hard and ugly”. Read: “control-able” and “un-control-able”; or rather, “easily definable” and “not so easily definable”. “Eve” was ‘easy on the eyes’, whereas “Lilith” was ‘difficult on the eyes’.

The two brides “Eve” and “Lilith” represent what the ‘Gnostics’ called “The Eidolon” and “The Daemon”. They are the “Intimate Lovers”, always bound in a Marriage. That marriage is not “forthcoming” except for those who still imagine that their separation is “a given”. And that is what is described by this Trump: the supposition that their relation is “separate”. This is not an error: at this stage of conception, the individual still imagines that these two are “separate” and must yet still be “externally conjoined”. This icon is not about the actual “union”; it is rather about an imagination of the “separate” condition, the “need” to “join hands”. That is why this Trump is rather still within a ‘prepatory’ stage.

Atu V depicts “The Teacher”, and is sequentially placed between Atu IV “The Divine Upstart” and Atu VI “The Devout Follower”. The ‘Teacher’ is placed in the awkward position of tending to both “the chosen ruler” and “the disciple”. Atu IV represents the receiver of instruction that is not required to receive instruction. Atu VI represents the receiver of instruction that is required to receive instruction. The Student will thereby gain the full benefit of “previous wisdom” that the “divine emperor” will miss out. The ‘Teacher’ has to cajole the ‘Emperor’, but can demand the ‘Student’.

“The Student” is placed in the unique condition of Being Oriented by ‘an experienced other’. Atu VI is rather an extension of Atu 0 in the sense of “abandonment of the previous”. “What I thought I knew is now abrogate, and now I place myself willingly to receive new information.” The mind-set of a real Student is hardly ‘passive’; it actually requires a form of ‘will’ that The Emperor cannot even cognize. In the most extreme example, what is thought of as ‘will’ must be totally overthrown in favor of complete obedience. Thus, you have in various traditions the “hoodwinking” of the young initiate — which is not merely a metaphor of “you were blind and now you see”. When done properly, this tactic has the “back-door” effect of engendering ‘will’ in a way that no instruction of ‘willful behavior’ can match. When done improperly, the ‘Teacher’ has merely “a slave”.

So, the series of lessons ensue, and if successful, then at Atu XIV the Marriage of ‘The Eidolon’ and ‘The Daemon’ is actually consummated!

O-A-Hum
OPD

The Ultimate Pilot

Atu XX is called “The Aeon” in the Crowley-Harris Tarot. Crowley’s use of the term is difficult and misleading, especially for “the beginner”. He ‘distorted’ the idea of “an epoch” to conform to his desire to ‘create a new religion’ ( a huge mistake in my opinion). One is better off investigating the use of that term with regards to “Gnosticism”. (I have yet to read Jung’s book by that title.) The ‘classic’ full title is “The Last Judgment”, which is infinitely superior to the foreshortened “Judgement”; but one is much better off dissociating the “X-tian connection” to that phrase.
Crowley’s design of Atu XX, even by his own description, is claimed to be a portrait of “the Hierarchy of the New Aeon”, which is technically correct but, again, misleading by the presented wording. Instead of “back-pedaling” and then “forward-pedaling”, I’ll just jump right in.

The Developing Human has gone through the entire adventure as described by the Trump Series — from the initial “Abandonment of the Previous” of Atu 0 unto the eventual “Discovery of the Fuel Chamber” of Atu XIX. Atu XX is a portrait of a new Vehicle of Incarnation (a schematic if you will), and is “the rebirth” unto “a new human”. (I want to say “new being”, but let’s keep this within ‘humanity’.) The Seated Central Deity is “the new person” placed at the Captain’s Chair of the New Space-Time Vehicle. The “Wand of Power” in one hand is “the shifting-stick of the transmission gear-box” controlling “the velocity”. The other hand is “steering the vehicle” controlling “the orientation” (the phrase “I have crushed an universe, and nought remains” is a groovy technical phrase). The Ghostly Twin Sibling is what is commonly called “the astral body” of the physical pilot. In another sense, this is the gnostic Daemon in relation to the seated Eidolon. The Surrounding Goddess (Nuit) is not only the Shell of the overall Vehicle, but also the Distortion of Space-Time about that Vehicle, whereby “point A” and “point B” are ‘curved’ into coincidence. The Basic God-Focus (Hadit) is multi-aspect: the “point A+B” coincidence, the “fuel source”, and (to use a ‘disneyland’ metaphor) the monorail track of the Vehicle.
The complex image at the very base of the portrait, the “hebrew-letter-shin” with the “three children”, and the flames surrounding, I will not get into except that they refer to the ‘classic’ version of this card — yet beyond the average considerations.

For those not acquainted with “space-time travel”, I simply invite you to search for the presentation given by ‘the heretic-scientist’ Bob Lazar, who actually ‘back-engineered’ one of the “extra-terrestrial vehicles”.

This “New Vehicle” is a complete violation of “what we are supposed to be” according to Nature. (Atu VII “The Chariot” is the Vehicle “we are supposed to be” according to Nature.) For those who pretend that “human evolution” is “better”, you should double-check with Nature “who prefers you that you subscribe to ‘her’ parameters”. Nature does not want the “new human” described in this portrait. The stage depicted with this portrait requires a “real grown-up attitude”, when you are cast out of the gestating house and unto a real ‘wild abandon’. “You are now A God.” This is very different from ‘answering to a god’. The “Children of Nature” have a much ‘easier’ time with the matter of ‘living’. All you have to do is “stay asleep” within the ‘bed-chamber’ of “mother”s choosing. Animals are very much friendly with this tactic. And “sleeping humans” are very much entrenched in animal life.

I was reluctant to use the term “resurrection” with this card, rather than “rebirth”, so I ran to my ‘trusty’ dictionary. The following three definitions are offered: a) “the act of rising again after death” (ok); b) “a bringing back into use” (ok); c) “a body snatcher” (HA! There It Is!). Atu XIV also qualifies as a “resurrection” of sorts; so how was that to be distinguished from Atu XX? Actually, in the “long analysis”, there is definitionally “no difference” — so the difference is only to be cognized within the Trump Series. But there is a huge difference between the “Temperence” stage and the “Aeon” stage, given the various ‘trans-terrestrial’ stages between those two (Atus XVI, XVII, XVIII and XIX).

O-A-Hum
OPD

The Multi-Faceted Beast

Psychology 101:
There is the legend of the Multi-Headed Beast. These heads may tend not to speak with each other. (To hell with the seven numeration with that myth-metaphor — that is of a special matter.)
So, given the circumstance, you respond “I am a carpenter”, or “I am an electrician”, or “I am a car mechanic”; or, “I am not happy”, or, “I am an asshole”‘, or, “I love you”; — or even more fundamental — “I am sleepy”, or, “I am happy”, …or, “I am sad”, or, “I am mad”; — and then even more fundamental — “I am walking”, and/or, “I am talking”, and/or, “I am feeling (something)”.

The Many Faces of “The Beast”. Another wizard used another metaphor — The Machine. ‘IT’ Thinks, ‘IT’ Feels, ‘IT’ Moves, etc. etc.

And ‘pity’ the past humans. There was always this desperate search for some “hidden divine pilot” buried deep within that machine of Many Personas. “There must be some ‘singularity’ reconciling the ‘multiplicity’ ?! So-called ‘psychology’ is a continued addiction to that myth-metaphor. The stumblers-in-the-dark tried to resurrect certain ancient practices. But they ignored certain records.
At the time of the Buddha Advent, there was the desperate search for “The Atman” (the inner pilot). The Buddha (some three thousand years ago) came to his fellow seeking brethren and broke the awful news: “There ain’t no such thing! Give it up!” His main message was “An-Atman” (without Atman). He then proceeded to teach his fellow seeker-brothers the techniques to discover how to verify the absence of that myth, as he himself had found. He faced an entrenched cultural indoctrination that “there must be an Atman”.
Jump forward some two-three thousand years. Physicists were thoroughly convinced that “there must be an ether which conducts light”. It was a ‘cultural’ given. There was an experiment in the late 1800’s to verify the existence of that ether. The experiments failed to verify such ether existence. Then some young ‘upstart’ dared to challenge the established assumption. His name was Einstein. He dared to tell the establishment: “The experiment does prove something — that there is no ether necessary to conduct light.” He then proceeded to demonstrate such. However, the ramifications of his demonstration also proceeded to destroy many other assumptions of classic physics.
The Buddha destroyed many presuppositions about ‘classic’ suppositions of Human Behavior. So too Lao Tzu in his realm; so too The Nazarene in his realm. So too the so-called ‘grandfather’ of Modern Psychology, Freud. And then look at what his direct protegé, Jung, attempted! And then the inheritors of those techniques thereafter?
But as with many awesome attempts, there is the initial propulsion — and then there is a fade into “the given”. Will humans never learn? — maybe not!”

But back to the original proposition: the Many Heads of the Beast-Machine, and the desperate search for the so-called “inner pilot”. The many heads biting each other, surrounding the mythic central ‘inner pilot’. This is rather the most terrible revelation-to-self for those addicted to the delusion of ‘a continuous self’. Yes, the physical form changes during the growth process, yet there is a perceived ‘continuity’ of ‘sameness’. That must translate into the ‘psychological’ arena, eh?
I still hear many humans who stumble with some metaphor of ‘a contract’ made by the ‘individual’ with “the universe” (or with “God” or with their otherwise transpersonal deification). Then they go on to imagine that the ‘contract’ involves all the various encounters of interpersonal dynamics somehow defining some ‘meaning’ to the alterations of personal behavior thereby resultant. It must be part of the ‘contract’ that we ‘learn lessons’, eh?
During a recent discussion, it was asked whether that “learn lessons” method was part of the ‘contract’. I stumbled with that idea, and attempted to describe that if you want to subscribe to the ‘contract’ metaphor, then keep it within the so-called ‘biologic contract’. There are certain properties of one’s biologic construct which can ‘remain consistent’, and then will lend to the delusion of some consistency. As to the Behavioral Properties: those involve perpetual ‘re-wording’ of the ‘contract’. The youngling proclaims “I will be a fireman” or “I will be a policeman”. The elderling then proclaims “I am an accountant” or “I am a disaster relief specialist”. The youngling struggles with the multi-headed beast-machine with the “I will be…” metaphor. The elderling struggles no less, but the metaphor is transformed into the “I am…”.

The nature of the Beast-Machine, with its many heads, is directly associated with the Behavioral Properties. The bio-machine may have some ‘contractual’ consistency. But each step we take in the concourse of the multiverse changes the Behavioral Properties, which were never grafted ‘permanent’ into some ‘contract’.

O-A-Hum
OPD
originally published Oct. 31, 2010

Desperate Planning

   

We humans (animals) tend to perceive structure (eye, ear, etc.), and from those, many tend to project from that a desire for some fantasy of “pattern”, and even further, the fantasy of “design”. Some passively accept this “design” model; but many others go further to then fantasize that there MUST BE A “DESIGNER”.

This Search-Desire for “A Designer” takes on many fascinating models, which unfortunately for many humans has produced the Fantasy of “A God”. Even my legacy-organization The Freemasons attempted a ‘renaming’ of that method by the term “The Grand Architect” — a desperate attempt to separate the “Great Designer” metaphor from the stupid ‘Control Freak’ monster they saw destroying the idea. But even they made a miss by clinging on to some ‘Grand Planner-Coordinator’ metaphor mixed in with some idea of centralized ‘control’.

Return to the ‘simplified’ method of ‘the’ YIN-YANG process: Enfolding & Unfolding. Sub-Atomic Processes enfold into Atomic Structure, and thereby unfold unto some ‘endurance’. Atomic Structure enfolds-combines into Molecular Structure, and thereby unfolds unto some further ‘endurance’ for those otherwise virtual sub-atomic ‘particles’. Molecules enfold into Cellular Structures, which even further unfold the ‘endurance’ of those very virtual sub-atomic ‘particles’ so deeply resident in the now growing complex structure. This “ladder” continues to cascade unto more complex structuring by serial enfoldings-combinations of the scale elements, and thus further unfolding of ‘endurance’.

Does this process describe “pattern”? Yes, according to our perception. Does this process describe “order” and/or “design”? Not necessarily ! The above described processes do not require any imaginary “Grand Planner”. Just because some “sentient being” perceives pattern and then projects a preconceived notion that such pattern MUST involve so-called “intelligent design”, is no proof of such a “Grand Planner”. It is simply proof of The Prover’s Obsession with their Model of Control. This all must, must, must make sense, yea?

This is where many make a miss in interpreting Atu III: The Empress. “She” is the Pure Happenings, which precede all considerations of the desperate attempts of all so-called ‘cognizant entities’ to make sense of the perceived patterns; and precedes the phase of Atu IV: The Emperor, who then attempts to configure his world as “Ruler” — ironically, “ruler” = “measurer”, “interpreter”. This newly-enthroned Emperor-of-one’s-own-empire MUST evaluate, coordinate, consolidate the vast array of otherwise non-sensical data into some semblance of order. The poor fool is now entirely dependant upon the ‘instructions-from-above’, to properly construct the empire.

This is here the danger of Atu V: The Hierophant. This figure has the awesome responsibility to properly instruct the Young Emperor on how to construct and conduct His Empire. If this figure-head has been poisoned with some Dæmon of Deception, the Young Emperor is now summarily cursed with the same poison, and the Empire is summarily distorted into that configuration. And this Hierophant does not get simple pass for ‘misunderstanding’. To achieve the Role of An Hierophant is not a light matter, and to bring poison to all the Young Emperors is HIGH CRIME. The simple Emperion of one’s own Empire is the business of that Emperor. Manipulation by the Hierophant deviant to the success of an Individual Empire, in favor of some Trans-Empire Poisonous Imagination is, again, High Crime in the Hierophantic Art.

All the “Priests of Plan” are Criminals, in the opinion of this ‘humble’ Mad Wizard. To promote the deception of any necessity for some “Grand Designer” to the Young Emperor desperately constructing one’s empire, is a direct violation of the time-honored Hierophantic Art. The tools of some ‘basic coordination’, and some hints at self-acceleration are the principal instruments — and then watchful instructions as the youngling stumbles.
And by the way, I would go so far to say that the Genuine Hierophants might be watchful of the Abberants who would poison the Young Emperors, and maybe take a blade to the necks of those Pretend Hierophants who would so joyously corrupt the Young Emperors into some Blind Allegiance with Their Dæmon. To be very clear — the “false path” is any ‘belief’ in some ‘Controlling Deity’.

O-A-Hum
OPD
originally published Sept. 4, 2010

A Comment on Atu I

The so-called Magus. But there is the Juggler Metaphor.
If I remember Crowely correctly, he descibed The Great Magus as giving a ‘death hug’ to The Princess, tearing her body into ribbons and shreds, by his Razor-like fingers.
To terribly discover that you terribly bias your perception of ‘reality’ ?
“How did I ‘create’ This ?”
Oh now, this terrible admission to Self.
‘The Magus’, occurring at the Beginning of the Tarot Sequence, ‘is’ ‘The Great Deceiver’.
This is how we tell ourselves that We Are Correct. Who are ‘We’? Well, that is necessary to Construct ‘Righteousness’. There must be ‘A We’ to justify this Constructed Righteous Behavior; because this cannot occur in a vacuum!
The ‘Great Deceiver’ is ‘How We Construct Our “Reality”‘.
“Are ‘We’ Correct ?” “Do ‘We’ have a Consensus ?”
Am I constructing my ‘reality’ in consensus with your ‘reality’? Or, more important ! Are you constructing your ‘reality’ in consensus with My ‘Reality’ ?
The Magus (in this ‘downward’ delineation) is the ‘terrible’ revelation of how You Construct Your Own Reality. You ‘create’ the ‘parameters’ of What Is Possible. You ‘create’ the ‘perimeters’ of What Is Allowable. The beginner is ‘forgiven’ of such violations, but the ‘mature’ have no such legitimate excuse.

O-A-Hum
OPD
originally published Dec. 14, 2009